Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?

Paying for reviews could increase the pool of reviewers, particularly reaching researchers who cannot afford to work for free. Payment could ...

Why aren't we get paid to review papers? : r/postdoc - Reddit

Why aren't scientists unionize and demand to be monetary compensated for writing reviews during the peer review process?

What's Wrong with Paying for Peer Review? - The Scholarly Kitchen

The journal reviews 1/0.25 = 4 articles to find one that is publishable, and the authors of the publishable article pay the costs for reviewing ...

The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers? - Science

A.M.: There is no practical way to pay reviewers without wrecking peer review. Reviews vary wildly in length, quality, and complexity. Where ...

What are pros and cons for paid peer review? [closed]

Remember that you will need 2-3 reviewers per paper, and you will need to pay them even if the article is rejected. It's not uncommon for ...

Can someone get paid as a peer reviewer for scientific journals ...

You have to be an expert on a particular topic. And the review must be done without fear or favour. So that means no payment.

Who pays the price for peer review? - Morressier

Calls to pay peer reviewers have grown louder in recent years as it has become more difficult to source academics able and willing to evaluate ...

How Much Do Peer Reviewers Get Paid? - Reviewer Credits

Peer reviewing is a means of giving back to the academic community. Researchers benefit from the peer review process when their own work is reviewed and ...

Should a Peer Reviewer Be Paid? - Enago Academy

Peer reviewers get paid for reviewing books and conference papers, so why should journals be any different? Critics argue that payments to peer ...

Should peer review of journal articles be paid? - ResearchGate

I would say yes because peer reviewers spend time to review the articles against some standards before it is cleared for publication.

No to paid peer review - The Lancet

First, paying peer reviewers would imply increases in subscription fees and article processing charges that many authors and institutions might ...

Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers? - PubMed

Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?

Can we stop saying reviewers are unpaid? | Scientist Sees Squirrel

It is not work that is assigned or expected by one's employer, and you would get paid exactly the same salary by forgoing being a reviewer. Or a ...

If there is ever going to be a time peer reviewers will be paid for their ...

Peer reviewing for many peer reviewers has come with no financial benefits. For a few, there is little motivation in terms of minimal ...

Amid high profits and falling wages, peer reviewers must be paid

Reviewers invest substantial time and energy in meticulously assessing research papers. Compensation would underscore the significance of their ...

Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix ...

The job of a professional reviewer can be regulated by adopting new ethical and professional standards to safeguard the peer review process from ...

Is paid peer review a good idea? | Editage Insights

Reviewers are also researchers who take out time from their research work, teaching, etc. to go through scientific papers. · Journals earn money ...

Why I don't want to be paid for peer review - Editage

As an academic, peer review is a way of giving back to the community that helped you build your own career. Commoditising a voluntary community ...

Should peer reviewers be paid for their work? - Talking Brains

So what about paying reviewers? Would you be more willing to review a paper if you were paid $50 or $100 (if it was submitted on time of course ...

Can a paid model for peer review be sustainable when the author ...

This explains the observation that there are/have been some journals that pay peer reviewers. For example, reviewers for journals published by ...