• Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?🔍
• The $450 question🔍
• What's Wrong with Paying for Peer Review?🔍
• What are pros and cons for paid peer review? [closed]🔍
• Should reviewers be paid for their contribution?🔍
• Why aren't we get paid to review papers? 🔍
• Can we stop saying reviewers are unpaid?🔍
• Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix ...🔍

Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?

Paying for reviews could increase the pool of reviewers, particularly reaching researchers who cannot afford to work for free. Payment could ...

The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers? - Science

The pair contended that paying reviewers could ameliorate some widely noted flaws of peer review, including long delays in receiving reviews ...

What's Wrong with Paying for Peer Review? - The Scholarly Kitchen

It seems more likely that paying people would lead to effort commensurate with the pay received. A $100/review journal will get reviews done in ...

What are pros and cons for paid peer review? [closed]

I would say perhaps the authors should pay. The $100 is just a placeholder, there can be some sweet spot amount that both sides (authors and ...

Should reviewers be paid for their contribution? - ResearchGate

The whole chain of journals' production is paid, so why not the reviewers ? Payment for reviewers is a good incentive to accept papers for ...

Academics, do you think reviewers should be paid for their ... - Quora

It depends on the type of review. For decades, I have been an occasional peer reviewer of manuscripts for a couple of physics publications.

Why aren't we get paid to review papers? : r/postdoc - Reddit

If everyone thinks this, who will review papers? Most research positions expect reviewing papers as part of your duties, so you are getting paid ...

Can we stop saying reviewers are unpaid? | Scientist Sees Squirrel

It is not work that is assigned or expected by one's employer, and you would get paid exactly the same salary by forgoing being a reviewer. Or a ...

Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix ...

The job of a professional reviewer can be regulated by adopting new ethical and professional standards to safeguard the peer review process from ...

Why don't journals pay to reviewers as they bleed authors for ...

Researchers need to take the time and make an extraordinary effort to make the review as good as possible, but they are not paid for it. I ...

How Much Do Peer Reviewers Get Paid? - Reviewer Credits

Monetary payments, honoraria, or other incentives can validate their contributions, motivating them to continue participating in the peer review process.

Is paid peer review a good idea? | Editage Insights

Moreover, some researchers feel that paid reviews would, in fact, take away the focus from publishing good science to the monetary gains by peer ...

Is It Time to Pay Peer Reviewers? - The Chronicle of Higher Education

It allowed me to read the new papers. And I really felt like, hey, I'm making a contribution,” Kunst said. “And at that time, I was still able ...

Should peer reviewers be paid for their work? - Talking Brains

So what about paying reviewers? Would you be more willing to review a paper if you were paid $50 or $100 (if it was submitted on time of course ...

Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix ...

Publications are typically included as deliverables in research grants, and therefore, the contribution of peer reviewers to improve these deliverables can be ...

Should journals pay for manuscript reviews? | Small Pond Science

Is it good for people to be compensated for their work? Yes. However, would it be worth the necessary consequences if it became standard ...

Amid high profits and falling wages, peer reviewers must be paid

Introducing financial incentives would inject a new vigour into the review process. Motivated by compensation, reviewers might be more inclined ...

Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?

Another problem, which is rarely addressed, is that evidence suggests that the number of reviews contributed by high-income countries is higher ...

Why I don't want to be paid for peer review - Editage

Paying reviewers won't reduce bias. Unfair assessment because of personal biases against the author is one of the biggest risks with peer review ...

Should Peer Reviewers Be Paid? - PublishingState.com

4. Recognizing Peer Review as a Legitimate Contribution ... Peer review should be formally recognized as a critical part of academic work. Like ...