Should we give up half of the Earth to wildlife? Populations ...

Should we give up half of the Earth to wildlife? - The Guardian

Simply setting aside half the planet as wilderness and using the other half for giant cities and farms poses other difficulties. Pollution, ...

Should we give up half of the Earth to wildlife? Populations ... - Reddit

Populations of all kinds of wildlife are declining at alarming speed. One radical solution is to make 50% of the planet a nature reserve by 2050.

Can the World Really Set Aside Half of the Planet for Wildlife?

“It's been in my mind for years,” Wilson told me, “that people haven't been thinking big enough—even conservationists. Half Earth is the goal, ...

Why 50% - Nature Needs Half

Setting aside 50% of the planet for nature is the fastest, most efficient action we can take toward solving the twin crises of climate change and extinction.

What is the Half-Earth conservation idea? - Environment America

His research concluded that if we conserve half of the Earth, we would save at least 80% of the earth's species. In Dr. Wilson's words, “…only ...

Half the planet should be set aside for wildlife – to save ourselves

If we want to avoid mass extinctions and preserve the ecosystems all plants and animals depend on, governments should protect a third of the ...

Half Earth: Setting Aside 50 Percent of the World for Wildlife

There are very few places in the world where governments would be willing to give over half their land and resources to nature, and even if they ...

Opinion: Half-Earth Day is not a celebration, but a warning

Unless humanity learns a great deal more about global biodiversity and moves quickly to protect it, we will soon lose most of the species ...

Protecting Half the Planet and Transforming Human Systems Are ...

The unfolding crises of mass extinction and climate change call for urgent action in response. To limit biodiversity losses and avert the ...

Protecting Earth: If 'Nature Needs Half,' What Do People Need?

The campaign to preserve half the Earth's surface is being criticized for failing to take account of global inequality and human needs.

The geography of hope: saving half the earth

Without room to meet their evolutionary and biological needs, species dwindle in numbers. Isolated, smaller populations court extinction. The disappearance of ...

Protecting biodiversity with Half Earth Project

What if humans gave half of planet Earth back to nature? In this future, half of the world's land would be permanently protected. That would not only save ...

Saving 'Half-Earth' for nature would affect over a billion people

Based on their analyses, researchers cautiously estimate that an additional 760 million people would find themselves living in areas with new ...

promises, pitfalls, and prospects of dedicating Half of Earth's land to ...

How best to allocate and manage Earth's land to maximize biodiversity conservation in the face of competing demands for food, housing and other human needs? Can ...

We need to save our wild places. We can't survive without them

We're wiping out the rest of life on Earth a thousand times faster than the natural extinction rate, and we're filling that biodiversity ...

To Conserve Nature in the Anthropocene, Half Earth Is Not Nearly ...

Will an interconnected global protected area covering half of Earth's land be enough to conserve the bulk of Earth's terrestrial biodiversity ...

What If We Set Aside Half the Planet for Wildlife? - YouTube

What if instead of making 50% of earth human free, we make every country 50% free of humans, only 50% of the land can be used for civilization rest nature/wild ...

Could we set aside half the Earth for nature? - The Guardian

By preserving half of the planet, we would theoretically protect 80% of the world's species from extinction, according to the species-area curve ...

What if we gave half the planet entirely back to nature?

Setting aside half of Earth's surface for only nature could directly affect more than 1 billion people, primarily in lower-middle-income countries.

We Must Save Earth's Wildlife In Order to Save Ourselves | TIME

A report shows a 73% decline in the average size of monitored wildlife populations in 50 years. This decline has a dangerous ripple effect.