Smith v. United States
21-1576 Smith v. United States (06/15/2023) - Supreme Court
United States, 351 U. S. 215, 221, and this. Court has repeatedly rejected objections based on the hardships cre- ated when a defendant is ...
A case in which the Court held that the Constitution permits the retrial of a defendant following a trial in an improper venue conducted ...
Smith v. United States - SCOTUSblog
The Constitution permits the retrial of a defendant following a trial in an improper venue conducted before a jury drawn from the wrong district.
360 US 1 (1959) Argued Jan 21, 1959 Decided Jun 8, 1959 Sort: 6–3 decision for Smith majority opinion by Earl Warren
Supreme Court Report: Smith v. United States, 21-1576
The question presented is “[w]hether the proper remedy for the government's failure to prove venue is an acquittal barring reprosecution of the offense.
SMITH v. UNITED STATES | Supreme Court - Law.Cornell.Edu
The trial for crimes “not committed within any State . . . shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.”
Smith v. United States | The Federalist Society
Federal law imposes mandatory sentence enhancement penalties, specifically 30 years for a "machinegun", if a defendant "during and in relation to . . . [a] drug ...
Smith v. United States | 94 U.S. 97 (1876)
This Court will refuse to hear a criminal case unless the convicted party suing out the writ of error is where he can be made to respond to any judgment which ...
Smith v. United States (2023) - Wikipedia
Smith v. United States (2023) ... Smith v. United States, 599 U.S. 236 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court case pertaining to Article III and the Sixth ...
Smith v. United States - Ballotpedia
The outcome: The court affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in a 9-0 ruling, that if a trial is held in an improper ...
Smith v. United States | 170 U.S. 372 (1898)
The government claimed that the condition of the bond had been violated by the failure of Smith to faithfully disburse all public moneys and to honestly account ...
UNITED STATES v. SMITH (2023) - FindLaw Caselaw
UNITED STATES of America, v. Jatiek SMITH, et al., Defendants. 22-cr-352 (JSR) Decided: May 11, 2023
Smith v. United States, 157 F.2d 705 | Casetext Search + Citator
The only testimony about the purse indicated both lack of personal knowledge and failure of reliable recollection on the part of the witness. That the key found ...
[Smith v. United States] Oral Argument | C-SPAN.org
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [Smith v. United States], a case on criminal law.
22-899 Smith v. Arizona (06/21/2024) - Supreme Court
Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. SMITH v. ARIZONA. CERTIORARI TO THE ...
Smith v. United States - SCOTUSblog
Smith v. United States ... Holding: A defendant bears the burden of proving a defense of withdrawal from conspiracy. Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by ...
Smith v. United States, 358 F.2d 833 | Casetext Search + Citator
Appellant's conviction for unlawful possession of narcotics must be reversed because the trial court erred in admitting evidence of narcotics seized from ...
Whether "community standards" of the state of Iowa can be defined by state legislatures so as to be applicable in federal obscenity law. Action.
Term Talk (2022-2023): Smith v. United States, Samia v ... - YouTube
Criminal Law. Venue. Double Jeopardy Clause. Sixth Amendment. Experts analyze the Supreme Court's holdings in important criminal law cases.
Smith v. United States: 2022-23 Supreme Court criminal decisions
The Northern District of Florida dismissed the motion, stating that Smith's location was a factual matter to be resolved by a jury. A jury found ...