State v. Cupp
Cite as State v. Cupp, 156 Ohio St.3d 207, 2018-Ohio-5211.
[Cite as State v. Cupp, 156 Ohio St.3d 207, 2018-Ohio-5211.] R.C. 2967.191—A defendant is not entitled to jail-time ...
STATE v. CUPP, 2006 Ohio 1808 | Casetext Search + Citator
The notice alleged that he was in violation of rule one, which required him to "refrain from violation of any law[.]" The notice alleged a violation of R.C. § ...
State v. Cupp :: 2006 - Ohio Case Law
[Cite as State v. Cupp, 2006-Ohio-1808.]IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff- Appellee : C.A. Case No.
State v. Cupp, 98 N.E.3d 738 | Casetext Search + Citator
{¶ 1} Appellant, Adam R. Cupp, appeals from the September 29, 2016 judgment entry of the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas convicting him of ...
State v. Cupp - Supreme Court of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Cupp, 2006-Ohio-1808.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. STATE OF OHIO.
STATE v. CUPP (2013) - FindLaw Caselaw
The court concluded that the total time of delay attributed to the state was not unreasonable and denied defendant's motion to dismiss. On the same day, ...
Frazier v. Cupp | 394 U.S. 731 (1969)
Petitioner was convicted, and the State Supreme Court affirmed. Petitioner thereafter filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court, which ...
Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case that affirmed the legality of deceptive interrogation tactics by the police.
Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (1969). - The Library of Congress
Supreme Court of the United States (Author). Created / Published. 1968. Headings. - Law; - Law Library; - Supreme Court; - United States; - Government Documents ...
643 - Supreme Court of the United States
Petitioner, v. H. C. Cupp, Warden,. Ho, 643. Respondent» s. - ...
Petitioner Frazier, Respondent Cupp, Docket no. 643, Decided by Warren Court, Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
FRAZIER v. CUPP, WARDEN (1969) - Ballotpedia
FRAZIER v. CUPP, WARDEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 22, 1969.
CUPP v. STATE - Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Cupp, defendant below, was convicted of the offense of driving while under the influence of intoxicants. From the judgment and sentence fixing his punishment at ...
FRAZIER v. CUPP, 394 U.S. 731 (1969) - FindLaw Caselaw
United States Supreme Court. FRAZIER v. CUPP(1969). No. 643. Argued: February 26, 1969Decided: April 22, 1969 ...
Frazier v. Cupp Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained - YouTube
... States Supreme Court first examined this issue in the nineteen sixty nine case Frazier versus Cupp. The police took Martin Frazier into ...
Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (1969): Case Brief Summary | Quimbee
Frazier appealed his conviction to the United States Supreme Court arguing that his confession was illegally obtained and improperly admitted as evidence.
Williams v. Cupp - Case Law - VLEX 895733697
Elmer Dorsey WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Hoyt C. CUPP, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent. Court, Oregon Court of Appeals. Page 1154. 487 P.2d ...
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. DISPOSITION: 461 F.2d 1006, reversed. SYLLABUS: Over respondent's ...
Cupp v. Murphy – Case Brief Summary (Supreme Court) - LawPipe
Cupp v. Murphy, upheld the seizure of physical evidence from a suspect without his consent even though he was not under arrest, and the police ...
U.S. Reports: Cupp v. Murphy, 412 U.S. 291 (1973).
Title. U.S. Reports: Cupp v. Murphy, 412 U.S. 291 (1973). Names. Stewart, Potter (Judge); Supreme Court of the United States (Author). Created / Published.