Structured Peer Review
Structured peer review question banks - Elsevier
A series of questions to make it easier for you to convey recommendations for improvement in a structured manner.
Structure peer review to make it more robust - Nature
Structure peer review to make it more robust. Everyone who reviews a manuscript should answer a transparent set of questions, to ensure that ...
Structured peer review: pilot results from 23 Elsevier journals - PeerJ
Background Reviewers rarely comment on the same aspects of a manuscript, making it difficult to properly assess manuscripts' quality and the ...
Peer Review Writing Guide - Reviewer Resources - SAE International
Make sure to include feedback on the strengths, as well as the weaknesses, of the manuscript. Examples and explanations of those should consume most of the ...
Structured peer review: pilot results from 23 Elsevier journals - PMC
Reviewers rarely comment on the same aspects of a manuscript, making it difficult to properly assess manuscripts' quality and the quality of the peer review ...
Structured peer review: pilot results from 23 Elsevier journals - PeerJ
The structured peer review format was well-received by reviewers, leading to more comprehensive coverage of topics. There was improved agreement ...
Structured Peer Review: Pilot results from 23 Elsevier Journals
Structured peer review consisting of 9 questions was piloted in August 2022 in 220 Elsevier journals. We randomly selected 10% of these journals across all ...
How to conduct a review - Elsevier
Since peer review is confidential, you also must not share information about the review with anyone without permission from the editors and authors. Generative ...
Step by Step Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript - Wiley Author Services
When you receive an invitation to peer review, you should be sent a copy of the paper's abstract to help you decide whether you wish to do the review. Try to ...
Peer Review – Best Practices : Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Most commonly the format is (1) Summary, (2) Decision, (3) Major Concerns, and (4) Minor Concerns (see also Structure Diagram above). There is also often a ...
Completing a Structured Review Form in Editorial Manager - YouTube
A structured review form consists of a set of core questions to help you review ... MDPI Editorial and Peer-review Process. MDPI•9.3K views · 6:53.
Writing a Peer Review | Dove Medical Press | Open Access Journals
Peer-review is a confidential process. · Peer-review comments can only be accepted online via our reviewer system. · Your review should provide an ...
A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances ...
We show that a two-review, integrated mentorship program improved the structure of submitted reviews which reflects new skills related to ...
Using JIRA for highly structured peer review : r/technicalwriting
I am wondering if any folks here experienced with JIRA could help me decide if it's a good choice for my program's process.
Structure Peer Review to Make it More Robust - OPUS Project
To bolster the robustness of peer review, it's essential to introduce a structured framework ensuring consistency and thoroughness across ...
Peer assessment - Center for Teaching Innovation
Peer assessment or peer review provides a structured learning process for students to critique and provide feedback to each other on their work.
Structured peer review using a custom assessment program for ...
A custom assessment computer program was designed for structured implementation of review. The study shows that students who participated in the peer review ...
Writing a peer review is a structured process that can be learned ...
We hope these 12 steps help you on your way to writing your first peer review, or improving the structure of your current reviews.
EMBARKING ON STRUCTURED PEER REVIEW WITH ...
Students perceived structured peer review positively, noting its contribution to learning since they could learn even by reviewing their peers' ...
Preprint on Structured Peer Review published - EASE
Preprint on Structured Peer Review published · Introduction. Is the background and literature section up to date and appropriate for the topic?