Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors | Jane Friedman

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors · Substack can confuse authors about the most important purpose of the email newsletter · Substack ...

Is Substack the Best Platform for Writers? Jane Friedman's Expert ...

... substack-is-both-great-and-terrible-for-authors/; Sign up for Jane's free newsletter, Electric Speed, or see if The Hot Sheet, her paid ...

I'm confused by what the incentive is to write on Substack for new ...

I've read that Substack isn't great for new writers because the discoverability is so poor. ... Really not a bad idea for Tannah! Maybe they have ...

Mark Armstrong's Post - Jane Friedman - LinkedIn

Mark Armstrong's Post · Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors | Jane Friedman · More Relevant Posts · Substack Is Both Great and Terrible ...

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors | Jane Friedman

Mark Armstrong on LinkedIn: Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for ...

Some good advice from Jane Friedman for anyone thinking of starting a Substack newsletter. Launching a Substack is no different than deciding you'll blog…

why i am skeptical that substack can or should replace legacy media

(in short: it is very bad that rich patrons always have the option ... i feel dread even when the emails are from writers that i like whose ...

Why Substack Will Remain Popular Even Though It's Terrible

Why Substack Will Remain Popular Even Though It's Terrible. Are you ... best writers into entrepreneurship. Additionally, millennials ...

Robin Woods on X: "Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors ...

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors Jane Friedman https://t.co/AJ4Ny7yNrk.

What's the Matter with Substack? - by Karen Christensen

She is a curmudgeon about Substack: “Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors.” She's referred to writing on Substack as ...

Substack Sucks- Stick With Medium | by London Steinbeck

To summarize, the Substack platform is terrible. It feels like hard, frustrating work just to try to navigate it. The economics of Substack are ...

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors | Jane Friedman

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors | Jane Friedman. Article from. janefriedman.com. Their business model relies on you charging your readers, but ...

DiAnn Mills on X: "Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors ...

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors | Jane Friedman https://t.co/FNkraY8dkV #newsletter #writingtips.

Substack for Authors: An Exciting Opportunity or Just Hype?

There's no algorithm between you and your reader on Substack. The big flaw for authors on social networks is the algorithm between you and your ...

the worst thing to be on substack is a substacker

wrote two mini essays today because the news cycle gave me nothing and I had loads to say about two things in particular. deviating from my ...

I'm glad you found a platform that's working and paying! - Threads

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors | Jane Friedman. janefriedman.com. Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors | Jane ...

Is Substack the Best Platform for Writers? Get Jane Friedman's ...

Struggling to decide whether or not you should use Substack? Learn from publishing expert Jane Friedman how to weigh the pros and cons of ...

Substack Newsletters vs. Blogging

I'll wait : Why Substack is Both Great and Terrible for Writers. As a reader, I'd rather buy an author's actual books than buy a ...

Indie Author Social News: "Substack Is Both Great and Ter…"

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors Substack's business model relies on you charging readers, but don't discount the long-term ...

Substack Is Both Great and Terrible for Authors | Jane Friedman

2024 Mar 14 - Their business model relies on you charging your readers, but don't discount the long-term value of what you give away for free.