The Best Defense? When and Why States Strike First

The Best Defense? When and Why States Strike First - jstor

First, it reviews existing theories about preemptive and preventive attack, and their origins in analyses of the causes of the First World War and of nuclear ...

Striking First - DTIC

in which a state claimed it acted out of anticipatory self-defense, including the United States ... short, a good offense may not be the best defense, or may not ...

Strategic Defenses and First-Strike Stability - RAND

First-strike instability refers to a situation in which both the United. States and the Soviet Union have high incentives to strike first, result- ing in a ...

First strike (nuclear strategy) - Wikipedia

First strike capability is a country's ability to defeat another nuclear power by destroying its arsenal to the point where the attacking country can survive ...

What are the pros and cons of a US nuclear first strike? - Quora

The US is unlikely to initiate a nuclear first-strike, so I won't cover that. US reconnaissance satellites would detect ICBM launches from the ...

The Bush Doctrine: Strike First - Brookings Institution

In the 1950s, for example, the Strategic Air Command had plans to launch an all-out nuclear first strike against the Soviet Union if we learned that Moscow was ...

When Will States Strike First? Battlefield Advantages and Rationalist ...

claim that offensive advantages favor war, arguing that by limiting the risk of total defeat, defensive advantages may reduce the costs of conflict and thus ...

Why America Has a Launch on Attack Option - War on the Rocks

For this and other reasons discussed below, we believe that the United States should keep its intercontinental ballistic force “on alert” and ...

Air Force Doctrine Publication 3-70, Strategic Attack

Department of Defense (DOD) Directive 5100.1, Functions of the Department of · Defense and Its Major Components, states that one of the Air Force's functions is ...

Pledging 'No First Strike': A Step Toward Real WMD Cooperation

Launching a pre-emptive nuclear attack for any reason short of stopping an inevitable WMD attack against the United States would be contrary to all American ...

First-Strike Stability: A Methodology for Evaluating Strategic Forces

... States and the Soviet Union, and thus suggests ... First-Strike Stability and Strategic Defenses: Part II of a Methodology for Evaluating Strategic Forces.

When does an attack become one's best defense? - Quora

Attack is ALWAYS the best defense. "There is no victory in defense" is a well known military axiom. Sadly, it's not a method the good guys can embrace.

First strike | Nuclear Warfare, Deterrence & Preemption - Britannica

The advantage of a preemptive strike is that, by being the first to act decisively, a state renders the enemy unable to carry out aggressive intentions. There ...

Striking First: Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict

Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an attack is in progress? Is the Bush Doctrine of aggressive ...

Dilemmas of Deterrence: The United States' Smart New Strategy ...

If Washington pushes too hard, it risks alienating local populations and causing diplomatic setbacks. If Washington does not push hard enough, ...

"Nuclear Threats and the Role of Allies": Remarks by Acting ...

We were encouraged when the five declared Nuclear Weapons States – including Russia and China – affirmed that a nuclear war cannot be won and ...

No First Use - Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

A “No First Use” policy would make clear that the purpose of the US nuclear arsenal is deterrence, not nuclear war-fighting.

How the United States Might Justify a Preemptive Strike on a Rogue ...

Consider first the text of Article 51: “Nothing . . . shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against ...

The best defense is a good offense - Wikipedia

Generally, the idea is that proactivity (a strong offensive action) instead of a passive attitude will preoccupy the opposition and ultimately hinder its ...

129. Study Prepared by the Joint Chiefs of Staff - Office of the Historian

Effective defenses against both bombers and missiles would appear to be especially appropriate for defeating a limited attack because the defense would not be ...