- The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals🔍
- Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are ...🔍
- Peer review is essential for science. Unfortunately🔍
- Lorraine Johnson on LinkedIn🔍
- The limitations to our understanding of peer review🔍
- Letterhead Bias and Blind Review🔍
- What is the difference between a double blind peer|review process ...🔍
- The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer ...🔍
The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals
The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals
The case for “blinding” to make journal peer review fair seems less and less plausible to me for the long run. It even seems antithetical.
Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are ...
Yes, there is scientific research on this topic. Using data from ACM WSDM'17, A. Tomkins et al. showed that double blind reviewers are less ...
Peer review is essential for science. Unfortunately, it's broken. - Reddit
First, the idea was that editors would decide only if suitable reviewers could be identified so that a high quality review could be conducted.
Lorraine Johnson on LinkedIn: The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer ...
Hilda Bastian's insightful article on the failings of all types of peer review is a must read: https://lnkd.in/ednfdpX.
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
Now, publication of peer-reviewed journal articles plays a pivotal role ... Bastian, The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals ...
Letterhead Bias and Blind Review - University of Illinois Law Review
One could posit that the results of this study are invalid because journals that implement a blind review process may attract submissions from a ...
What is the difference between a double blind peer-review process ...
Single-blinded review is the standard and is followed by almost all journals. In this model, the reviewers know who the authors are.
The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer ...
Blinded reviewers and editors in this study, but not nonblinded reviewers, gave better scores to authors with more previous articles.
Double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity ... - OSF
Bastian, H., 2017, The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals (October 31, 2017),. Absolutely Maybe. Evidence and Uncertainties in Medicine and ...
The Failure of Double-blind Peer Review - Pathfinder
... the-fractured-logic-of-blinded-peer- · review-in-journals/. Csiszar, A. (2016). Peer review: Troubled from the start. Nature, 532(7599), 306–308. https://doi ...
Opening the Black Box of Peer Review - Physics Magazine
After working for about a decade as a journal editor, I'm concerned that peer review is not the safeguard against bad science that we think it ...
(PDF) Indigenous Knowledges and Scholarly Publishing: The ...
Bastian, H. (2017, October 31). The fractured logic of blinded peer review in journals. PLOS Blogs: Absolutely Maybe.
How double-blind peer review works and what it takes to be a good ...
This editorial describes the double-blind peer review process used by academic journals ... follow the logic of in dubio, pro reo. I would rather publish ...
How long (on average) does a double-blind peer review process ...
Papers usually receive between one and four reviews, depending on the journal. Reviewers usually work in the same field, ideally on similar ...
Weighing Up Anonymity and Openness in Publication Peer Review
When it's coupled with a policy of not revealing peer reviewers' identities, this style is called double-blind peer review. It can mean having a ...
An Homage to Peer Reviewers - ResearchGate
Bastian H. The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals. PLOS Blogs. October 31, 2017. Available at: https://blogs.plos.org/ ...
Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers - PMC
The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and ...
Why peer review should be fun, but can make you cry - Editage
One author noted that our conclusions were the best piece of the manuscript, whereas the other argued that the conclusions were merely sweeping ...
An Homage to Peer Reviewers: Strengthening Our “Bundle of Sticks”
Blinded peer review provides a layer of protection for the reviewers to assess each other's research. We recognize that there needs to be ...
Mieke Bal: Let's Abolish the Peer-Review System - Media Theory
If you imagine abandoning the blind peer review system as some authoritarian power grab, then you really have drunk the academic kool-aid a ...