The Impact Factor Fallacy

The use of the journal impact factor (JIF) as a measure for the quality of individual manuscripts and the merits of scientists has faced significant criticism ...

The Impact Factor Fallacy - PubMed

The use of the journal impact factor (JIF) as a measure for the quality of individual manuscripts and the merits of scientists has faced ...

The Impact Factor Fallacy. - PhilPapers

To approach the problem, we use principles of deductive and inductive reasoning to illustrate the fallacies that are inherent to using journal based metrics for ...

Opinion: On “The Impact Factor Fallacy” | The Scientist Magazine®

This practice has been widely criticized because the IF is a poor indicator for the number of citations of a specific journal article, and ...

(PDF) The impact factor fallacy - ResearchGate

To approach the problem, we use principles of deductive and inductive reasoning to illustrate the fallacies that are inherent to using journal based metrics for ...

The impact factor fallacy - bioRxiv

based on journal based metrics altogether. 80. Deductive fallacy when using the JIF. 81. A basic belief when using the ...

The impact factor fallacy - OUCI

To approach the problem, we use principles of deductive and inductive reasoning to illustrate the fallacies that are inherent to using journal based metrics for ...

(PDF) The Impact Factor Fallacy - ResearchGate

not-q. ... not fall down. Therefore,. the glass does not break. ... not carry an umbrella. ... dry. ... of high quality. ... (true). ... library catalog.

The impact factor fallacy - bioRxiv

science, in order to overcome incentive structures based on journal based metrics altogether. 77. Deductive fallacy when using the JIF. 78. A ...

Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating ...

On the basis of the Science Citation Index and authors' publication lists, the annual citation rate of papers by a scientific author or research group can thus ...

Changing Journal Impact Factor Rules Creates Unfair Playing Field ...

The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) calculation is based on the calendar year of publication. This is not an issue when a paper was e-published, say ...

The Impact Factor Fallacy - OUCI

Alberts, Impact factor distortions., Science, № 340 · Baratgin, “Logic, probability and inference: a methodology for a new paradigm,” in, Cognitive Unconscious ...

The Impact Factor Fallacy - Altmetric

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018. Altmetric Badge. About this Attention Score.

Why you should not use the journal impact factor to evaluate research

Impact factor, an index based on the frequency with which a journal's articles are cited in scientific publications, is the most widely used ...

The Career Series: Should impact factor matter? - The Pipette Gazette

It doesn't distinguish positive citations from negative ones. It's a mean rather than a median, and so heavily influenced by a few outlying ...

Nine reasons why Impact Factors fail and using them may harm ...

1) Using Impact Factors to judge or show the quality of individual papers or the authors of those papers is a clear ecological fallacy.

[1603.08452] Citations: Indicators of Quality? The Impact Fallacy

Abstract:We argue that citation is a composed indicator: short-term citations can be considered as currency at the research front, ...

Study results from journals with a higher impact factor are closer to ...

The purpose of most scientific medical studies is to estimate some unknown true parameter value based on data from a study sample. The study ...

Citations: Indicators of Quality? The Impact Fallacy - Frontiers

200, when introducing the “journal impact factor” (JIF). Unlike size-dependent indicators of impact based on the total number of citations (Gross and Gross, ...

August 3, 2018 – Social Neuroscience Lab | Lübeck University

The impact factor fallacy ... Abstract The use of the journal impact factor (JIF) as a measure for the quality of individual manuscripts and the ...