Events2Join

UNITED STATES V. BALL


United States v. Ball | 163 U.S. 662 (1896)

Ball. ... this court had decided that the former indictment was insufficient as an indictment for murder. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of murder against ...

United States v. Ball - Wikipedia

United States v. Ball ... United States v. Ball, 163 U.S. 662 (1896), is one of the earliest United States Supreme Court cases interpreting the Double Jeopardy ...

Ball v. United States | 470 U.S. 856 (1985)

Ball v. United States, 470 US 856 (1985) Argued: January 9, 1985 Decided: March 26, 1985 Syllabus US Supreme Court

United States v. Ball, 163 U.S. 662 (1896). - The Library of Congress

Gray, Horace, and Supreme Court Of The United States. US Reports: United States v. Ball, 163 US 662 . 1895. Periodical.

Ball v. United States, 140 U.S. 118 | Casetext Search + Citator

On a Sunday morning a jury returned a verdict of guilty against persons on trial for murder, whereupon the court remanded them to custody to await judgment and ...

BALL v. U.S., 163 U.S. 662 (1896) - FindLaw Caselaw

The circuit court, among other instructions, instructed the jury to find against both pleas of former jeopardy, because [163 U.S. 662, 666] this court had ...

Ball v. United States | Oyez

Petitioner Ball, Respondent United States, Docket no. 84-5004, Decided by Burger Court, Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

United States v. Ball, 22-cr-00449 | Casetext Search + Citator

Ball posits that the English laws were enacted to prevent sedition and insurrection, and therefore are improper analogues to § 922(g)(1), which is a blanket-and ...

UNITED STATES v. BALL (2021) - FindLaw Caselaw

Most importantly, the United States has a clear federal interest in prosecuting Ball based on [the] seriousness of his conduct, which included ...

BALL et al. v. UNITED STATES. | Supreme Court - Law.Cornell.Edu

E. Boutwell and John C. Ball be executed by being hung, until each and elther are dead, according to the forms, delays, and processes provided in the laws of ...

Ball v. United States – Case Brief Summary (Supreme Court)

Ball v. United States ... In Ball v. United States 163 U.S. 662 (1896), three defendants were prosecuted for murder. One was acquitted, the other two ...

UNITED STATES v. BALL | 163 U.S. 662 | U.S. | Judgment - CaseMine

On Sunday, November 3, 1889, the jury returned a verdict as follows: "We, the jury, find the defendants J.C. Ball and R.E. Boutwell guilty, as charged in this ...

UNITED STATES V. BALL, 163 U. S. 662 (1896) - Chan Robles

A defendant in a criminal case who procures a verdict and judgment against him to be set aside by the court may be tried anew upon the same or another ...

U.S. Reports: Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856 (1985).

(1984) U.S. Reports: Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856 . [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep470856/. MLA ...

04-506 - USA v. Ball - Content Details - - GovInfo

Actions · Browse U.S. Court Opinions · Help · CGP Record. Actions. Browse U.S. Court Opinions · Help ...

Ball v. United States, 84-5004 - Federal Cases - VLEX 891279646

Petitioner, a previously convicted felon, was arrested when the police found him in possession of another person's revolver that was reported missing; he ...

BALL v. UNITED STATES | 429 A.2d 1353 | D.C. - CaseMine

BALL v. UNITED STATES. KELLY, Associate Judge: Appellant George Ball was convicted by a jury of three counts of threats, D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2307, and four ...

Ball v. United States (140 U.S. 118) - Wikisource, the free online library

Ball v. United States (140 U.S. 118) ... A bill of exceptions to the action of the court in the admission of certain testimony over defendants' ...

Ball v. United States - Case Brief Summary for Law School Success

The Supreme Court held that a felon could not be convicted and sentenced under both statutes for the same conduct involving the same firearm. The Court reversed ...

United States v. Ball - Etalia.ai

In the United States v. Ball case of 1895, the Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning double jeopardy. The defendants, Millard Fillmore Ball and two ...