Understanding the Factors that Influence the Speed of Peer Review

A recent study analyzing more than 3500 review experiences found that more than 80% of cases took longer than 1 month to receive a first response.

Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer ...

Introduction. Peer assessment has been promoted as a valuable approach to formative assessment to support learning and peer professionalism.

Speed of review with respect to the paper's quality

Sometimes the review process can take a long time, sometimes it can be very short. I suppose that one of the important factors determining the ...

Understanding the peer-review process | University Libraries

The reviewers evaluate the article on the basis of its quality, methodology, potential bias, ethical issues, and any other factors that would affect the ...

Innovative Strategies for Peer Review - PMC - NCBI

Various factors aggravate the delay and quality of peer review. These include requests for multiple revisions and the lack of time for reviewers ...

AskScience, how does the peer review process actually work? - Reddit

many researchers will try to publish their paper in the journal with the largest impact factor possible. sometimes it works and their work gets ...

The limitations to our understanding of peer review

With this, it can be examined as to whether this leads to higher quality reviews, lengthier reports, longer submission times, influence on ...

Peer Review Metrics and their influence on the Journal Impact

If the time from 'submission to acceptance' increases, the 'Journal Impact Data' (2-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Immediacy Index ...

Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author's ...

Aspects studied are duration of the first review round, total review duration, immediate rejection time, the number, quality, and difficulty of ...

Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review ...

Wiley, a global publishing firm, reports that 84% of researchers believe that without peer review there would be no control in scientific communication, and 90% ...

What's peer review? 5 things you should know before covering ...

But journalists must understand it is not infallible, she added. “Science is self-correcting through replication and reproducibility, and ...

Does speed matter in journal publishing? Practical tips for a faster ...

Our surveys consistently reveal that the single greatest factor authors consider is speed during peer review and the post-acceptance stage.

Social influence and peer review: Why traditional ... - EMBO Press

The traditional journals will need to develop more reliable modes of peer review, such as identifying reviewers, improving dialogue between all ...

Mastering the scientific peer review process: tips for young authors ...

He hopes that this paper will enhance your understanding and knowledge of the peer-review process. ... There're numerous factors that can affect ...

Peer Review Process - Medvix Publications

Peer review is a crucial process that ensures the credibility of scientific findings in medicine. Medvix Publication takes this process seriously.

PEER REVIEW - Sense about Science

Journals with high impact factors often receive more submissions, and thus have ... Understanding peer review gives patients a tool to weigh up these claims.”.

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of ...

Training, which included training or mentoring programs for peer reviewers to provide instructional support for appropriately evaluating ...

Author Information - JMIR Formative Research

Indexing and Impact Factor. Skip side navigation and go to main content ... speed of peer-review or publication. We aim for an average decision time of ...

Factors Affecting Journal Submission Numbers

They found the most important factors were IF, reputation, readership, speed of publi- cation, and the quality of the peer review system.

Peer review is f***ed up – let's fix it - Michael Eisen

Reviews come in essentially three flavors: Outright acceptance (rare), outright rejection (common for high tier journals), and rejection with ...