United States v. Fischer
23-5572 Fischer v. United States (06/28/2024) - Supreme Court
United States, 574 U. S. 528, 536 (plurality opinion), and “ 'give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of [the] statute.' ” Williams v ...
Fischer v. United States - SCOTUSblog
The government must establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or ...
Fischer v. United States | Oyez
A case in which the Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, ...
United States v. Fischer, 64 F.4th 329 | Casetext Search + Citator
It has since been used as a mental state in federal statutes covering bribery and obstruction of justice. In both its common-law and codified forms, "corruptly" ...
Fischer v. United States: Supreme Court Reads Federal Obstruction ...
On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Fischer v. United States, a case concerning whether a federal obstruction of justice ...
Fischer v. United States - Wikipedia
The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 in June of 2024 that the charge only applied when the defendant "impaired the availability or integrity" (attempted or successfully) ...
Search - Supreme Court of the United States
Fischer, Petitioner v. United States. Docketed: September 13, 2023. Linked with 23A136. Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ...
UNITED STATES v. FISCHER (2023) - FindLaw Caselaw
It “requires proof that the defendant not only knew he was obtaining an 'unlawful benefit' but that his 'objective' or 'purpose' was to obtain that unlawful ...
... U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Opinions released on November 12, 2024 in the following: 23-1067 - Marin Audubon Society v. FAA.
Fischer v. United States | Supreme Court - Law.Cornell.Edu
The DC Circuit held, and this Court does not dispute, that Congress's joint session on January 6, 2021, qualifies as an “ 'official proceeding.' ”
Fischer v. United States: A Supposedly Textualist Court Ignores the ...
On January 6, 2021, Trump supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol to disrupt the certification of Joe Biden's election victory. In Fischer v.
United States v. Fischer, 38 F.2d 830 (M.D. Pa. 1930) - Justia Law
The above authorities sustain the legality of the arrest of the defendants and the search and seizure contemporaneously therewith of the articles used in the ...
Term Talk (2023-2024): Fischer v. United States - YouTube
Criminal Law. Statutory Interpretation. Experts discuss the Court's interpretation of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act as applied to January 6 ...
U.S. v. Fischer, 205 F.3d 967 | Casetext Search + Citator
In 1988, a jury convicted Eugene Fischer of violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 846 by conspiring to distribute more than 300 tons of marijuana. The jury also ...
Fischer v. United States | LII / Legal Information Institute
Petitioner argues that the Court should interpret § 1512(c)(2) as only covering obstructive conduct interfering in official proceedings that ...
[Fischer v. United States] Oral Argument | C-SPAN.org
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [Fischer v. United States]. The case concerns a criminal statute used by the federal government to ...
Supreme Court Decides Fischer v. United States - Faegre Drinker
The US Supreme Court decided Fischer v. United States, No. 23-5572, holding that § 1512(c)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, imposing criminal liability on ...
Supreme Court Rules in Fischer v. U.S. | Lawfare
The court ruled in favor of a narrow interpretation of the obstruction statute that the Department of Justice has charged in at least 355 ...
District of Columbia | Fact Sheet: Fischer v. United States
In more than 82 percent of those cases—involving approximately 1,178 individuals—the defendants were either never charged with or not convicted ...
The Limited Effects of Fischer: DOJ Data Reveals Supreme Court's ...
Fischer had upheld the DOJ's interpretation of the statute in a 2-1 decision. 3. A reasonable interpretation of Section 1512(c)(2). The Justice ...