Events2Join

View of Moral Vegetarianism and the Philosophy of Mind


View of Moral Vegetarianism and the Philosophy of Mind

Presentation Mode Open Print Download Current View. Go to First Page Go to Last Page. Rotate Clockwise Rotate Counterclockwise. Text Selection Tool

Moral Vegetarianism and the Philosophy of Mind - PhilPapers

In this paper I evaluate problems that arise from Peter Carruthers' Higher-Order Thought theory of consciousness. I argue that, even if we assume that these ...

Moral Vegetarianism and the Philosophy of Mind C.J. Oswald

In this paper I evaluate problems that arise from Peter Carruthers' Higher-Order Thought theory of consciousness. I argue that, even if we assume that these.

(PDF) Moral Vegetarianism and the Philosophy of Mind

PDF | Most arguments for moral vegetarianism rely on thepremise that non-human animals can suffer. In this paper I evaluateproblems that arise from.

Stance: An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal

Most arguments for moral vegetarianism rely on the premise that non-human animals can suffer. In this paper I evaluate problems that arise from Peter Carruthers ...

David DeGrazia - "Moral Vegetarianism from a Very Broad Basis"

More specifically, he's attempting to argue for vegetarianism without invoking or contradicting any particular normative ethical theory, e.g. ...

Moral Vegetarianism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Moral vegetarianism is the view that it is morally wrong—henceforth, “wrong”—to eat meat. The topic of this entry is moral vegetarianism and the ...

Is non-vegetarianism moral from a philosophical point of view? - Quora

In my opinion, and in my experience I have found that being an omnivore is (can be) moral from a philosophical point of view.

Is 'veganism' a settled issue in Philosophy and Ethics?

A radical vegan position is irrational like a not vegan one. I find self-evident that the only potential enemies of expanding veganism are ...

Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism - De Gruyter

Vegetarianism is the view that we ought to eat plants, mushrooms, and so on, but that we ought not to kill nonhuman animals (“animals” hereafter) ...

Why some philosophers think you should be a vegetarian

The moral arguments behind vegetarianism are ancient, numerous, and well reasoned. · They tend to focus on the actions behind meat production.

COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY AND MORAL VEGETARIANISM

Philosophy Vol. 24, (1948). 'OFeinberg, Joel. "Collective Responsibility," in his Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory.

Why the Naïve Argument against Moral Vegetarianism Really is Naïve

Moral vegetarians think that it is morally wrong for us to eat meat. A common response to this view, especially among non-philosophers, is what Peter Alward.

(PDF) Moral Vegetarianism from a Very Broad Basis - ResearchGate

One need only assume some reasonable view of animals' moral status. When it comes to the consumption of meat and other animal products, there is a remarkable ...

Jeff McMahan on Vegetarianism - philosophy bites

If an animal is brought into existence to be eaten, the farmer's moral responsibility is no more than to ensure that it is well treated before ...

Philip E. Devine, The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism - PhilPapers

If someone abstains from meat-eating for reasons of taste or personal economics, no moral or philosophical question arises. But when a vegetarian attempts to ...

A Critique of the Moral Defense of Vegetarianism - SpringerLink

About this book. Drawing on research in plant science, systems ecology, environmental philosophy, and cultural anthropology, Andrew F. Smith shatters the ...

Intro to Philosophy 3: Moral Vegetarianism - YouTube

Lecture on Stephen Law's Philosophy File 1 (Should I eat meat?) and Mylan Engel's "Vegetarianism". Apologies for crappy sound - it was ...

Vegetarianism and Virtue: Does Consequentialism Demand Too ...

In "The Immorality of Eating Meat," Mylan Engel argues that the view that "eating meat is immoral" follows from a set of ordinary moral beliefs that most people ...

The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism | Canadian Journal of Philosophy

The smugness with which man could do with other species as he pleased exemplified the most extreme racist theories, the principle that might is ...


Michael Huemer

Professor https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQCHQndlTfRYfxjzSKierj3nwiAJdKZq0e2bcBlv3jqYA4kjl4B

Michael Huemer is an American professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He has defended ethical intuitionism, direct realism, libertarianism, phenomenal conservatism, substance dualism, reincarnation, the repugnant conclusion, and philosophical anarchism.