Events2Join

What is your experience as reviewer of MDPI and Applied Sciences ...


What is your experience as reviewer of MDPI and Applied Sciences ...

The average time for revised manuscript review is three days then I really question the quality of the review.

Reviewing papers for MDPI: general feeling as a reviewer

My experience is in line with what is often written here: MDPI will simply look for other reviewers if they dislike your peer review report. A ...

My experience as a reviewer for MDPI - BishopBlog

After a recent zoom-call where Dorothy and I discussed several research-related topics, she invited me to write a guest blogpost about the ...

Do you accept to review for MDPI? : r/AskAcademia - Reddit

I frequently get emails to review articles from MDPI journals and, after frustrations with the short timeline to submit reviews and the poor ...

Testimonials - MDPI

My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation ...

I'm gonna ask whether publishing in MDPI journals is good or more ...

Therefore I recommend this Journal to publish plus it is now placed on PubMed from Brain Sciences. My papers have all experienced high ...

I have a question about being a reviewer of MDPI - Facebook

Some say MDPI pays the reviewers for timely reviews in the form of vouchers. I searched and found the link to apply as a reviewer. BUT it says "Volunteer ...

Why are the peer-reviewing processes at the MDPI publisher so fast ...

MDPI has much shorter default times for review. A typical MDPI journal might ask for reviews to be turned around in 10 working days.

Testimonials - MDPI

I was very happy to be able to review a journal article that will be published by MDPI. In short, I can say that the peer-reviewed journal concept meets ...

Just got rejected from an MDPI journal, after two rounds of reviews

Had experience with 2 MDPI journals, one got me through a very meticulous and comprehensive review process and the other one was ridiculous.

Guidelines for Reviewers - MDPI

Peer review is an essential part of the publication process and it ensures that MDPI maintains the highest quality standards for its published papers. All ...

Testimonials - MDPI

My experience with MDPI was excellent. The peer review process was painless, the feedback on my original manuscript really helped improve it, and the reviewers ...

Why should articles published in MDPI journals be excluded ... - Quora

These journals are not considered top tier but, in my experience, they provide legitimate peer review.

Testimonials - MDPI - Publisher of Open Access Journals

My experience with the MDPI is unbeatable. It has always been satisfactory. This is my reference editor for the publication of my studies.

How to Become a Peer Reviewer - MDPI Blog

MDPI journals are actively looking for volunteers to review manuscripts. If you are interested in reviewing for an MDPI journal, you can create ...

Testimonials - MDPI

“It was a very satisfactory experience. The review process was fast and the paper quality was improved. The publication process was even faster and the final ...

Guest Post – MDPI's Remarkable Growth - The Scholarly Kitchen

MDPI is like the McDonalds of publishing. They push reviewers with a 7 day deadline (fastest in the industry as far as I know) and send a lot of ...

Improving the peer review experience for reviewers and authors

In today's landscape of increasing publication volumes and large amounts of information, peer review is more important than ever.

A Critical Assessment of the Peer Review Process in Life

Even now, thousands of papers are retracted yearly due to plagiarism and scientific misconduct. At MDPI, this issue is not an issue because the ...

Is MDPI a predatory publisher? - Paolo Crosetto - WordPress.com

MDPI publishes good papers in good journals, but it also employs some strategies that are proper to predatory publishers. I think that the ...