• "When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons🔍
• When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons🔍
• Are judges required to give reasons for their decisions in civil cases?🔍
• Professional Irresponsibility and Judicial Opinions🔍
• Judges as moral reasoners🔍
• Code of Conduct for United States Judges🔍
• When the Law and a Judge's Personal Opinions Collide🔍
• Judicial Ethics🔍

"When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons: A Comparative ...

Influential theories of law have celebrated judicial reason-giving as furthering a host of democratic values, including judges' accountability, ...

When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons

For instance, French prerevolutionary courts had an established practice of not giving reasons for their decisions. Legal historians usually ascribe this non- ...

"When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons - A Comparative ...

Influential theories of law have celebrated judicial reasongiving as furthering a host of democratic values, including judges' accountability, ...

When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons: A Comparative ...

First, it argues that although reason- giving is important, it is often in tension with other values of the judicial process, such as guidance, ...

When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons - ResearchGate

First, it argues that although reasongiving is important, it is often in tension with other values of the judicial process, such as guidance, sincerity, and ...

Are judges required to give reasons for their decisions in civil cases?

No. Trial courts almost never are required to explain their decisions. If the parties think that they are wrong, they can take an appeal and ...

Professional Irresponsibility and Judicial Opinions

And judges' primary audiences do not need to be pulled in with an appealing style because they have strong motivating reasons to read and ...

Judges as moral reasoners - Oxford Academic

... judges are not, and this must count as a reason for supposing that … judges are more likely to likely to reach sound conclusions about ...

Code of Conduct for United States Judges

Canon 3A(4). The restriction on ex parte communications concerning a proceeding includes communications from lawyers, law teachers, and others who are not ...

When the Law and a Judge's Personal Opinions Collide - NCSC

(Iowa State Bar Association, 2018: 3-4). While these efforts are laudable, there is no reason to limit the explanation of a judge's duty to follow the law and.

Judicial Ethics: Why Rules Matter, and Why the Reasons for the ...

The debate about whether and to what extent a given justice had ... courts had taken no action because of a culture of deference among judges.

Protecting Fair and Impartial Courts: Reflections on Judicial ...

We would not need judges who are learned or ... We have many wonderful state court judges who have been chosen and retained through election systems.

When It Comes to Civility in Court, It's Do or Die

Retired Washington State Superior Court Judge T.W. “Chip” Small offers a great example in his book You Are Not a Lawyer Anymore: A Primer for ...

The judicial duty to give reasons

Historically, the notion that judges need not give reasons for their decisions may have come about because it had been improperly linked to the fact that ...

Judges do not express personal opinions in performance of judicial ...

This ethical issue becomes especially important when judicial candidates are on the ballot. In the legislative and executive branches, it is ...

Fair and Impartial Courts: Why You Should Care

In the end, we need judges to make unpopular decisions because fairness is not determined by popularity. Fairness is determined by applying the law in a neutral.

Ethics Policies | United States Courts

Judges may not hear cases in which they have either personal knowledge of the disputed facts, a personal bias concerning a party to the case, earlier ...

Judicial Discretion in the Civil Law

Besides these historical factors, there are certain structural reasons for not granting ample discretionary powers to the judge. Among these reasons is the idea ...

The Obligation to Give Reasons - Legal Theory Blog

This is, of course, a complex question. It's quite obvious that trial judges do not have an obligation to write a written opinion justifying ...

Judicial Misconduct and Public Confidence in the Rule of Law

... judiciary- citizens who believe their judges are fair and impartial. The ... Judicial conduct oversight should not attempt to regulate purely personal aspects of ...