Why is NFS a lot slower than Samba in this case and can we make it ...

Future: NFS · Exactly the same issue here. Opening a simple text file can take up to 10 seconds. · Sadly not. The administrator I was supporting ...

NFS vs SMB share? Speed and security? : r/unRAID - Reddit

NFS better for small files. But as you are finding, can depend a lot on how you have it configured and the client. I'm on windows so I try to ...

Slow NFS but SMB and local access are fast | TrueNAS Community

The disparity may be greater than you expected. Between my NAS and a bog standard Linux PC, I get 117MB/s for a single large file xfer over SMB.

Win10 NFS Client a SAMBA Killer? - Server Fault

In my personal experience SMB & SAMBA has faster throughput than NFS only second to HTTP (yes, even FTP is slower). NFS also has some file state ...

Why are NFS writes half of SMB and Afp? | TrueNAS Community

Hello, I am a bit confused as i get half of write throughput for same dataset shared via NFS than for Smb or Afp? My MacBookPro gives me ...

Network share: Performance differences between NFS & SMB

However, SMB is more or less a Microsoft protocol. To get the best performance, you need to use Windows servers and clients. For Windows users, ...

NFS share slower than samba - Linux Mint Forums

There are no such things as "stupid" questions. However if you think your question is a bit stupid, then this is the right place for you to post ...

Which is "better" - NFS or Samba? - LinuxQuestions.org

Well, FTP is usually faster than Samba of NFS, just because it is a simpler protocol. But what kind of speed are we talking about here? How long ...

NFS vs SMB: Differences Explained - NAKIVO

NFS is faster than SMB when using encryption. Reading transactions are faster in SMB with the 4-MB rate. High traffic loads can slow down ...

Question - SMB 20x slower than NFS - The Unofficial Synology Forum

Question: what can I be doing wrong and how can I get more decent speeds on SMB? Basically mounts: Bash: # Mount of NFS mount -t nfs doctor ...

SMB vs NFS: browsing performance - NETGEAR Communities

NFS generally is faster when you are reading/writing lots of small files, so I'm ...

NFS vs. SMB Speed Problem - Zidoo forum

So for high rate DVDs we all used NFS. These days, with improvements in SMB and hardware (switches and networks are a LOT quicker and more ...

Solved: NFS or SAMBA - which would you choose - HPE Community

If you can get Samba going with HP-UX as a client, then I say go with it. If you have MS clients as well as HP-UX, then definitely go with Samba ...

SMB/NFS speed issue - Streaming & Network - Firecore - Community

Seems something wrong with SMB and NFS implementation in Infuse, looks like issues with TCP, because I get 100Mbps via WiFi and 250Mbps via ...

[SOLVED] nfs or samba for a file server [Archive] - Ubuntu Forums

In any case, Samba isn't that slow (~0.8MB/s if 700MB takes 15min). That looks more like a weak wireless connection. Over a wired connection you ...

NAS- use SMB or NFS shares to connect? [Archive]

And it's a potential cause of performance differences. I thought at one time Scale was going to use the Linux kernel NFS implementation, maybe ...

Which to use NFS or Samba? - Ask Ubuntu

In a closed network (where you know every device), NFS is a fine choice. With a good network, throughput it disgustingly fast and at the ...

Chapter 44. Samba Performance Tuning

Generally, you should find that Samba performs similarly to ftp at raw transfer speed. It should perform quite a bit faster than NFS, although this depends on ...

macOS Finder is still bad at network file copies | Jeff Geerling

At any rate, in my case, I did find that NFS was significantly faster than SMB, so I use that whenever I need to transfer lots of stuff. It's ...

What's wrong? Why is NFS slower than Samba? - QNAP Forum

It's look like easy. I have a lower transfer rate, if I use NFS. The slower connection Samba has substantially more speed to play, but not enough to play m2ts ...