Events2Join

Why is Rust port of function 2x slower than C ?


Why is Rust port of function 2x slower than C++? - Stack Overflow

When benchmarking the code on the same dataset, the C++ code averages around 15 seconds, while the Rust compiled code averages around 30 seconds total runtime.

Huge performance gap in simple loop. Explanations? : r/rust - Reddit

Once the array is fully mutable and initialized with random values, Rust is slightly faster than C on Intel and slightly slower on M1. This ...

In my benchmark, I found Rust slower than C

Hey guys, I did some tests between C and Rust and the results are quite different, Rust is slower than C. For C I got .000002 and for Rust I ...

Looking for help understanding Rust's performance vs C++ - Page 2

... 2x slow down due to missed vectorization. ... She recorded perf all along the process of sneaking in that first extern "C" Rust function, all the ...

Rust is now overall faster than C in benchmarks | Hacker News

[1] suppose the programs are independently created at the same time by programmers of equal ability and are idiomatic in their languages. If a C ...

Why is Rust slightly slower than C? - Hacker News

Compiling their C code with clang reveals that it is also slightly slower than the C code compiled by GCC, but not faster than Rust.

Gather slow workflows from stakeholders · Issue #232 - GitHub

Link to code: https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io; which workflow is slow: All of the above. Rebuild after changes is probably the mots ...

Why is the programming language Rust slow? Is it really slower than ...

I would not state that Rust is slow, not as a blanket statement. Rust shares 99% of the same compiler stack than C, C++, F, Julia, ...

Investigating Managed Language Runtime Performance - USENIX

Why JavaScript and Python are 8x and 29x slower than C++, yet Java and Go can be faster? ... function into a C function). The difference in ...

Performance Showdown: Rust vs Javascript - Cesar's Bitacora

... to day) first and then port the code to Rust. ... This is a surprising turn of events, here we can see the Rust version is 2x slower than ...

Assorted thoughts on zig (and rust)

The compiler can accurately infer the exact set of errors that can be returned by each function. (In rust it's very tempting to just have a ...

C isn't a Hangover; Rust isn't a Hangover Cure - Lobste.rs

Rust's situation is even worse than in most languages, in that core Rust libraries (major libraries officially maintained by the Rust project) ...

My experience crafting an interpreter with Rust - Manuel Cerón

This is a port of Google's SwissTables, a high-performance hash map implementation in C++. It even uses SIMD instructions to scan multiple hash ...

What are the advantages of Julia over Fortran?

This is typically between 2x slower (if the python/R calls out to C ... This is often completely acceptable for non performance-critical code.

Is it possible that rust will surpass c/c++ in terms of performance in ...

In fact with the extra information available to the compiler (e.g. that two arrays cannot refer to overlapping memory) it's possible that some ...

[ANN] reed-solomon-erasure 1.0.1 - Ecosystem - OCaml

It is a port of the Rust ... I did opam switch 4.06.1+flambda but it runs around 2x slower ... The performance of said setup sits at ~600MB/s, so pure OCaml version ...

[help needed] nim version of: COMPARING PYTHAGOREAN ...

... C++, D, AND RUST ... Fair enough, but 5% is much less than the 2x variation sensitivity from PGO. ... function that ran 24x (twenty four times) faster than a C one.

Poor deque performance vs Rust. Is this solvable? - Go Forum

On the plus side, Go is almost 5x faster than my benchmark in C#!. I ... My first idea was to port VecDeque to Go, but it turns out that ...

Authoring a SIMD enhanced Wasm library with Rust

x > 10000: Wasm SIMD speedup plateaus at 3x, is 4x slower than x86 SIMD. ... function in Rust to Wasm. Testing showed that, unfortunately for ...

Newest 'benchmarking' Questions - Page 2 - Stack Overflow

Why is Rust port of function 2x slower than C++?. I have a function to compute String edit distance in C++: #include #include #include ...