Why is the 6pdr better than the 75mm tank gun at killing tanks?
Why is the 6pdr better than the 75mm tank gun at killing tanks? - Quora
The QF 6 pdr was a better anti-tank weapon than the M3 75 mm Albeit the QF gun came in a range of types with different barrel lengths ...
6pdr vs 75mm What's your choice? : r/Warthunder - Reddit
At first glance it seems like the 6pdr would the obvious choice for fighting tanks, it has better chance of penetrating the frontal ...
Six-Pounder Versus Panzer - Warfare History Network
The six-pounder antitank gun was Great Britain's premier tank killing weapon when it first appeared in the Western Desert, proving able to pierce the armor ...
Ordnance QF 6-pounder - Wikipedia
The Ordnance quick-firing 6-pounder 7 cwt, or just 6-pounder, was a British 57 mm gun, serving during the Second World War as a primary anti-tank gun of ...
Tanks with 6-Pounder in 21 Army Group | WW2Talk
A proportion of tanks (1 in 4) would carry the 17-pounder, which was an even better anti-tank weapon than the 6-pounder and capable of dealing ...
6-Pounder, Deadliest Gun in the Game :: Steel Division
A 6pdr has 11AP at 1,000m that increases by 1 every 100m closer it is to the target so 13 at 800m. A Tiger E has 12 front armor. You're just bad ...
British tank gun after the 6pdr? - alternatehistory.com
As the war goes on artillery cover becomes more available, which makes the original justification for little HE in tanks more valid. At the same ...
6pdr on the Churchill - What range do we expect to kill Panthers and ...
... 6pdr gun because of the Churchill and would like to know more. I am ... Tank Breakthrough Battalions, along KV tanks. The Churchill was ...
The 6pdr QF Anti-Tank Gun - The Armourers Bench
The 6pdr was a 57mm gun, firing a 57x441mmR shell effective out to 1,700 yards or 1,500m – with a rated maximum range of 5,000 yd. Unlike its ...
British 75mm MkV tank gun [Archive] - .com.unity Forums
Most targets were dealt with by HE, not AP. UK armoured formations did retain some 6 pdr armed units, because the plain 6 pdr AP was better then ...
[TMP] "6pd ATG" Topic - The Miniatures Page
The 6pdr has a somewhat better performance at closer ranges, which was why 75mm gunned Churchill troops normally also had one tank with a 6pdr.
Anti-personnel Rating - Revising Crossfire Anti-tank Rules 4
I think tanks should be more potent than a HMG. In my Armour ... And a tank shooting with 4d6 (main gun) then 3d6 (machine guns) is ...
75mm vs 57mm - which is better for killing tanks?
The 75mm has a vastly beter HE shell, though. I think that is why many cehicles were switched from the 6pdr (57mm) to the 75mm gun. Jason ...
76 mm vs. 75 mm guns on Shermans
The armor penetration of the 76mml53 gun was much higher than that of the 75mm pea-shooter. While the 76mm could easily penetrate the pz4 at ...
Recommended Specs for BFV Vehicles and Discussion on ... - Sym
The 75mm and 105mm guns are nice, but the slower RoF hurts overall damage output against infantry, and the damage output versus armor isn't as consistent as ...
6 pdr Anti-tank Platoon (BBX38)... - hobby
The Quick-Firing 6-pounder is a 57mm anti-tank gun which made its combat debut in the Gazala battles in May and June 1942. Dug-in and firing at only ...
A Better 6 pounder | Aircraft of World War II - WW2Aircraft.net Forums
It also weighed a whole lot less than than all the rest of the heavy AT guns the Germans dragged onto the battle field, like all those 88mm guns ...
How did the Allies figure out how to counter the German anti tank ...
The 2pdr couldn't defeat the frontal armor (50mm) of German tanks at point blank range due to nose breakup on a soft base projectile.
Ordnance QF 6-pounder | Military Wiki - Fandom
The Ordnance Quick-Firing 6-pounder 7 cwt, or just 6 pounder, was a British 57 mm gun, their primary anti-tank gun during the middle of World War II, ...
Should British 57-76mm cannons be given applicable SAP/APHE for ...
6pdr is fine at its br, I quite like it. 75mm does have issues but the tank it's on is generally over tiered and they even acknowledged that in ...