• Why is the review process not double blinded🔍
• Double|blind Peer Review... What are the benefits and drawbacks?🔍
• Why Is Double|Blind Peer Review Bad for Publishing?🔍
• Is Double|Blind Review Better?🔍
• Research Integrity and Peer Review🔍
• Peer review🔍
• Single|Blind Vs. Double|Blind Peer Review🔍
• Single|Blind and Double|Blind Peer Review🔍

Why is the review process not double blinded, and then unblinded ...

The blinding during the review process is there to protect the reviewers from retaliation. It sounds like you want to know who was rude to you ...

Double-blind Peer Review... What are the benefits and drawbacks?

It suggests a focus on the number of “blinds” rather than the process itself. Anonymous reviewing is more straightforward in conveying that both ...

Why Is Double-Blind Peer Review Bad for Publishing? - Enago

When the authors are deduced from the paper's contents, the double-blind procedure turns into a single-blind review but without the safeguard of ...

Is Double-Blind Review Better? | American Physical Society

According to Langenberg, the double-blind process gets to the point of what a good peer review should be, plain and simple. “It just takes away anything but the ...

Research Integrity and Peer Review - BioMed Central

The quality of the reviews conducted double-blind was better than of those conducted single-blind. Switching to double-blind review did not ...

Peer review: Single blind vs double blind - Ex Ordo

Peer review is the process of subjecting an author's research to the scrutiny of experts. Using a peer review process (single blind vs double ...

Single-Blind Vs. Double-Blind Peer Review - Simple Guide

With a double-blind review process, the author's identifying information must be stripped from the piece before it is submitted to the reviewer.

Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review | CW Authors

Advocates of double-blind peer review argue that it goes further towards reducing the possibility of bias in the peer review process. Anyone ...

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review - PNAS

This information asymmetry persists through the process of bidding for papers, reviewing papers, and entering scores. Reviewers in the single-blind condition ...

Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of ... - PubMed

Double-blinding adds considerable work for authors and editorial staff and has no positive effect on review quality. Furthermore, the authors' results ...

Single-Blind Vs. Double-Blind Peer Review - Enago Academy

Single-blind peer review is a conventional method of peer review where the authors do not know who the reviewers are. However, the reviewers know who the ...

Why don't all disciplines follow a double-blind review system?

It seems that knowing the identity of the authors could influence the review such that the quality of the research no longer stands by itself.

Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author ...

Although 1 study found double-blind reviews to be of higher quality, others detected no differences. ... However, these studies were limited by ...

Double-Blind Reviews: A Step Toward Eliminating Unconscious Bias

Proponents of double-blind review suggest that it is a more impartial process that limits biases and results in higher quality peer reviews.

Editorial: Single-blind or double-blind review processes?

When authors submit a paper, they receive reviews without knowing the names of the reviewers. Reviewers are blinded in order to give them the ...

Shouldn't the peer review process be double-blinded? - ResearchGate

The peer review process can even be made TRIPLE-BLIND, where the reviewer also should not be revealed to the editorial board. This will nullify ...

FAST '23 Double-Blind Submission and Reviewing Guidance

The paper review process will be double-blind. Authors must make a good faith effort to anonymize their submissions, and they should not identify themselves.

Why is the peer-review process not double-blind in certain science ...

Double-blind peer review should be the norm in science. It almost certainly won't hurt authors, but it can help in certain circumstances when ...

Double-Blind vs Single-Blind Peer Review - LinkedIn

Single-blind review just increases the chance of having reviewers biased racially, religiously, or academically.

Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding ...

Double-blinding had no effect on reviewer publishing recommendation or manuscript ranking. Review quality did not improve after the implementation of double- ...