Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those ...
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history)
Reliable sources for purely illustrative purposes acting as a "picture" · The weighting is derived from a scholarly source · The fact is derived from a ...
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
Ideal sources for biomedical material include literature reviews or systematic reviews in reliable, third-party, published secondary sources.
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science)
Scientific information should be based on reliable published sources and should accurately reflect the current state of knowledge.
Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (history)
1337 b0y in topic Isn't every topic arguably a historical topic? Learn more about this page The point of this page
Reliable sources allow editors to verify that claims in an article are accurate. The higher the quality of the source for the statement it backs up, the more ...
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (law)
Whether a law source is reliable or not needs to be assessed separately for each source. Law sources that are written by authoritative experts in law, such as ...
Wikipedia:Reliable source examples
1.1 Are Usenet postings reliable sources? · 1.2 Are weblogs reliable sources? · 1.3 Are web forums and blog talkbacks reliable sources? · 1.4 Are wikis reliable ...
Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Simple English Wikipedia, the free ...
Wikipedia articles should use reliable, third-party, published sources. (An article is a page in the main namespace. Most other pages, such as Wikipedia's ...
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/FAQ
These are some Frequently Asked Questions about Wikipedia's guidelines on sourcing for medical content, manual of style for medicine-related articles.
Is Wikipedia a credible source? - Paperpile
Although Wikipedia is a good place to start your research, it is not a credible source you should cite in your research papers. Wikipedia allows all kinds ...
Wikipedia Reliable Sources Policy: What Counts as ... - WhiteHatWiki
Editors who contribute to Wikipedia are expected to cite sources that meet strict standards of accuracy, credibility, and trustworthiness.
What Makes a Reliable Source for Wikipedia? - The Mather Group
All sources must be from second or third parties that are fact-based and trustworthy. If someone directly associated with the topic of the Wikipedia page is ...
Finding Reliable Sources - CCC Libraries Wikipedia Essentials
General database of academic journals in the sciences and humanities. Includes full text scholarly / peer-reviewed articles.
Wikipedia:Identifying and using tertiary sources
This page in a nutshell: Analysis and evaluation require reliable secondary sources, and we cannot cite tertiary sources for them. Tertiary sources differ from ...
Who decides what is and isn't considered a reliable source on ...
DO NOT CITE A WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE in your papers. Instead, scroll down and look up some of the references (e.g., newspaper articles, books, ...
Meet Wikipedia's Reliable Sources List: Another Proxy For Google's ...
With Wikipedia's reliable sources list, you can quickly understand the score a site receives, view the discussions around that site's ...
How to Determine What Constitutes a Reliable Source for Wikipedia
In order to maintain its quality, accuracy, and verifiability of content, Wikipedia has implemented best practices for using reliable sources.
The Truth About Wikipedia's Credibility - NetReputation
It encourages users to cite reliable sources, employs volunteer editors to monitor content, and encourages community feedback to identify and ...
While Wikipedia is by no means a replacement for scholarly books and articles, it can be of immense use as an exploratory, tertiary source. Of course, it is not ...