Peer review bias and double|blind reviewing

Does double-blind peer-review reduce bias? Evidence ... - NASA ADS

... reviewing policy from single-blind peer review to double-blind peer review in 2018. We find that after switching to double-blind review, the scores given to ...

The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific ...

The practice of double-blind reviewing dates back to the mid-20th century, when it was first adopted formally by select sociology journals. ... However, the ...

Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author ...

Bias with single-blind review might be greatest in the setting of author or institutional prestige. Methods. This study was approved by the ...

What is Double Blind Peer Review and How Does it Work?

The double-blind peer review process is a way to ensure impartiality and prevent any bias when reviewing.

Single-Blind vs Double-Blind Peer Review | Researcher.Life

It reduces the potential for biased reviews influenced by preconceptions about the authors. This anonymity helps to create a more equitable ...

How to minimise bias during peer review? | CW Authors

In double-blind peer review, the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other. Some journals have even introduced triple- ...

Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?

Ultimately, double-blind peer review might be a fairer process owing to its potential to minimise these biases. For reviewers, just as with single-blind peer ...

Single-blind vs. Double-blind Peer Review - ServiceScape

This is because, in double-blind peer reviews, the identities of the author and the reviewer are both hidden, eliminating some of the bias ...

(PDF) Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review

Significance Scientific peer review has been a cornerstone of the scientific method since the 1600s. Debate continues regarding the merits of single-blind ...

Chapter 5 - Blind Peer Review by Academic Journals - Bad request!

We then examine empirical evidence related to (1) blinding as a means of reducing bias; (2) blinding as a means of yielding higher quality reviews; (3) the ...

Double-blind peer review of manuscripts: opportunities, challenges ...

Closed peer review, principally double-blind peer review, is commonly used as part of academic publishing, with the stated aim of preventing bias in reviewing, ...

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review - NASA/ADS

... blind and two double-blind reviewers. Our analysis shows that single-blind reviewing confers a significant advantage to papers with famous authors and ...

Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review - ScienceDirect.com

The peer review process can also introduce bias. A compelling ethical and moral rationale necessitates improving the peer review process. A double-blind peer ...

What is double blind peer reviewed study? Who initiate such ... - Quora

Many scholars are of the opinion that double blind peer review reduces personal biases based on gender, seniority, reputation, and affiliation.

[PDF] Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review

This study considers full-length submissions to the highly selective 2017 Web Search and Data Mining conference and shows that single-blind reviewing ...

Shouldn't the peer review process be double-blinded? - ResearchGate

I think always possible peer review must be double blind in order to keep clear and unquestionable all proccess.

Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are ...

Yes, there is scientific research on this topic. Using data from ACM WSDM'17, A. Tomkins et al. showed that double blind reviewers are less ...

Peer Review: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly - Research Solutions

The potential for bias is not completely eliminated in a double-blind review. Why? Because reviewers can sometimes figure out who the ...

Can you explain the concept of 'double blind' peer review ... - Quora

That a peer review is double blind means that the reviewer does not know the identities of the authors, and that the authors do not know the ...

Do you feel that peer-review has become so biased that it is ... - Reddit

honestly speaking, even though it is hard to implement, all of the journals must go for double blind reviewing. The names of the authors and ...