Guidelines For Article Reviewers
Reviewer Guidelines - Manuscript Scientific Services
The reviewer's duties include assessing an article submission, writing review report and maintaining the quality of the journal by identifying invalid research.
Reviewers Guidelines - Academic Journals
Reviewers should focus on the following: Originality, Contribution to the field, Technical quality, Clarity of presentation, Depth of research.
DIGITAL GOVERNMENT: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE Reviewers
Reject a paper when the submission does not meet publication standards and where a revision is not feasible, either because of some insurmountable flaw in the ...
Reviewer Guidelines | Journal of General Physiology
Reviewer Guidelines | Journal of General Physiology | Rockefeller University Press Reviewer guidelines Reviewers are to contact the editor to discuss any ...
2.3 Reviewer Roles and Responsibilities - Council of Science Editors
More than three reviewers are sometimes used if reviewers from several fields are needed to obtain a thorough evaluation of a paper. In addition to fairness in ...
Reviewer Guidelines | Leading Publisher in STEM Fields
It is appropriate for the Peer Reviewer to discuss the potency and limitations of an article, ways to enhance and evaluate the quality of the article, relevance ...
Reviewer Guidelines: Research Articles - The WAC Clearinghouse
We have provided detailed Author Guidelines for Research Articles. Based on those guidelines, the categories below ask reviewers to make a series of analytic ...
Guidelines for Reviewers | The North African Journal of Food and ...
The NAJFNR peer review process aims to validate academic work, helps to improve the quality of published research, and increases networking possibilities.
Reviewer and Editorial Guidelines - Sustainable Welfare
1) Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Reviewers should be aware of any personal bias and take this into account when reviewing an article.
Reviewer Guidelines - Language Development Research
Most reviewers start with a brief summary of the paper. This is generally helpful, as it allows the authors, reviewers and Action Editor to check that everyone ...
Guidelines for Reviewers - Scholarly Publication
This page details how to begin your peer review journey with Scholarly Publication, where you'll receive various benefits and rewards.
Guidelines for reviewers - Microbiology Society
Preparing your review · Is the article well written and of an appropriate length? · Is the number of tables and figures appropriate, or should some of the data be ...
Tips and guidelines for being a good peer reviewer - ScienceDirect
The aim of the peer review process can be stated as, “The valid article is accepted, the messy article improved, and the invalid article rejected.66, 67 ...
Choosing Reviewers for Paper | ResearchGate
many journals ask you to list names of potential reviewers when submitting a publication. Is this what you mean? If so, choose people who are in ...
Instructions for Reviewers - BMJ Open
Before writing your review you may find it helpful to browse our instructions for authors, available here. We ask authors to provide article summaries and to ...
How to Write an Article Review: Tips and Examples - EssayPro.com
Much like other assignments, an article review must contain an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. Thus, you might consider dividing your outline according ...
Please feel free to recommend alternate reviewer. • Do you have time to review the paper? Finished reviews of an article should be completed within six weeks.
Basics of Writing Review Articles - PMC - PubMed Central
A well-written review article must summarize key research findings, reference must-read articles, describe current areas of agreement as well as controversies ...
You have been invited to review this article based on your knowledge and expertise. If you have reviewed other articles for this publication in ...
Guidelines for Reviewers - De Gruyter
Reviewers should comment on the relevance of literature cited in the manuscript. They should give reference to any important research not mentioned in the paper ...