Events2Join

Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are ...


Nature to let potential authors try a double-blind date | Science | AAAS

Traditionally, scientific journals have adhered to a single-blind system, in which authors don't know the identity of those reviewing their paper. But that ...

Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review | CW Authors

In single-blind peer review, only the reviewers are anonymous. Reviewers know the authors' names and backgrounds, but authors don't know those of the reviewers.

Nature is not at all serious about double blind peer review

Here are the issues I see with the proposed Nature experiment. 1) It doesn't blind their editors. Nature uses a professional editorial staff who ...

How double-blind peer review works and what it takes to be a good ...

Like other prestigious academic journals, Current Sociology uses double-blind peer review for all articles it publishes. Each article is ...

Single vs. Double-Blind Review: Is it really bad to let reviewers know ...

To avoid this, some disciplines and journals are moving to double-blind review in which the names and affiliations of the authors are removed ...

Blinded Versus Unblinded Review: A Field Study Comparing the ...

The comparison also revealed that single-blind reviews favored senior coauthors and disfavored Asian (versus White) authors more than double-blind review.

Understanding peer review - Author Services - Taylor & Francis

Double-anonymous peer review. In this model, which is also known as 'double-blind review', the reviewers don't know that you are the author of the article. And ...

Double-Blind Review Policy - SC22 - SC Conference

The spirit of double-blind reviewing is that reviewers should not actively try to discover who the authors of a submission are. A reviewer who thinks he or she ...

The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future

There is evidence that double anonymisation reduces targeted biases associated with identity, such as selection against authors of a particular ...

Scientific peer review: single-blind, double-blind or open? - LinkedIn

However, just knowing who the authors are could create a bias in an independent reviewer's mind and the review that should have been based only ...

Does double-blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top ...

Peer review is essential for advancing scientific research, but there are long-standing concerns that reviewers are biased by authors' prestige or other ...

(PDF) Case for the double-blind peer review - Academia.edu

A survey of current research suggests that double-blind review offers a solution to many biases stemming from author's gender, seniority, or location ...

What is peer review? | Elsevier

Peer review helps validate research, establish a method by which it can be evaluated, and increase networking possibilities within research communities.

Peer Review Policy - Lectito

This journal maintains a double-blind peer review policy, in which both the reviewers and the author/s are anonymous.

A quick glimpse at double blind peer review [Flowchart] - Editage

In this approach, both parties involved i.e., the authors and the reviewers are unaware of each others' identities. All indicators of identity ...

Different Types of Peer Review - JAMS Blog

In this system, both the author and the reviewers do not know who the other parties are. Unlike single-blind peer review, this creates a greater ...

Health Psychology's new (old) peer-review policy.

A third study found no difference in recommendations between single- and double-blinded reviews (van Rooyen et al., 1998), and a fourth found that alternative ...

Use of artificial intelligence and the future of peer review

Many feel that double-blind peer review is quite difficult to achieve. In laboratory-based science, peer-reviewers are often familiar with other labs that are ...

2022 Double-blind FAQ - IEEE Secure Development Conference

Q: Why are you using double-blind reviewing? A: Our goal is to give each reviewer an unbiased “first ...

Peer review - Wikipedia

Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work (peers). It functions as a form of ...