Peer review bias and double|blind reviewing

Double-blind peer review is a bad idea - Daniel Lemire's blog

But please double-blind lessens the biases inherent to the reviewing process. In some sense, double-blind peer review gives even more power to ...

Understanding Bias in Peer Review - Google Research

This suggests that double-blind reviewers become more engaged in the review process. Finding (b) is less surprising, but nonetheless ...

Should peer-review be double-blind? - Claus O. Wilke

While double-blind review might solve certain problems and remove certain biases, it would almost certainly amplify other issues.

Double-Blind Peer Review - MIJRD

Double-blind peer review is the gold standard process used to assess ... This minimizes bias and enhances the impartiality of the reviews. The ...

A Case for Double-Blind Review - Academic Medicine

There is also evidence that double-blind reviewing helps to mitigate ... Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. Proc Natl Acad Sci ...

Reviewer Bias in Single-Versus Double-Blind Peer Review - Scribd

We present a controlled experiment in which four com- blind reviewing. mittee members review each paper. Two of these four review- ers are drawn from a pool of ...

The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific ...

Key words: double-blind, gender, bias, peer review. JULY 2022 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 43 ajog.org. Systematic Reviews. Page 2. single ...

Confidentiality in Peer Review: Single Blind, Double Blind, Open

Though Double blind review is intended as a measure of bias prevention, one should consider that in specialised research areas, a reviewer might still be ...

Does double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top ...

Peer review is essential for advancing scientific research, but there are long‐standing concerns that authors' prestige or other ...

Double-blind peer review - FORRT

Definition: Evaluation of research products by qualified experts where both the author(s) and reviewer(s) are anonymous to each other.

Comment Summary

Double-blind reviewing is a pain but I think it does make things a bit fairer. But I think the authors should be anonymous only for the initial review. 4, Jan 5 ...

Peer Review Week: Should we use double blind ... - Methods Blog

The obvious question is whether double blind reviewing does actually improve reviews: does it reduce bias, or improve quality? There have ...

The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific ...

Objective Gender-based bias during journal peer review can lead to publication biases and perpetuate gender inequality in science.

Peer Review Bias: What Is It, and What Causes It? - Lex Academic

In single-blind peer review, the reviewer knows the identity of the author, but the reviewer is anonymous. While this ensures that the reviewer ...

How Blind Is A Blind Peer Review Really? - inovex GmbH

This bias could impact the quality of the evaluation and ultimately lead to inequality in academic publishing. The double-blind peer review, ...

The limitations to our understanding of peer review

Squazzoni, Reviewing the review process: new frontiers of peer review. ... Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. Proc Natl ...

Peer review and implicit bias - University of Florida Pressbooks

Peer review can support constructive and generous feedback, or exclude and reinforce scholarly bias. Think about the review model that is best for making your ...

Effective Peer Review: Who, Where, or What? - JID Innovations

Studies have compared single-blind with double-blind reviewing and reported that there is no significant difference in the quality of the reviews. (Alam et al, ...

Exploring Criticisms of the Peer Review System - Physics Forums

The participants have varying opinions, with some defending the process and others acknowledging its imperfections. Some suggest alternatives, ...

Does double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a t

Peer review is essential for advancing scientific research, but there are long‐standing concerns that authors' prestige or other characteristics can bias ...