Should peer|review be double|blind?
Differences between Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review ...
This should be done by using an objective process. For example, avoid pairing authors with reviewers who share common backgrounds, like authors ...
When good intentions collide: double-blind peer review vs preprints
It also doesn't matter which journal rejected which preprint, and it doesn't matter who was the editor. The evidence / merits / consequences of ...
Double-Blind Submission, Author Response, Rebuttal, Reviewing ...
Double-blind is not intended to retard dissemination of research. However, authors should never try to influence program committee members while their paper is ...
Different Types of Peer Review - JAMS Blog
The double-blind system is the most neutral of the peer review systems. In this system, both the author and the reviewers do not know who the ...
Full article: Double-blind multiple peer reviews to change students ...
Unfortunately, we realised that the peer assessment that our version of Blackboard could facilitate only worked for pair of students switching assignments for ...
How double-blind peer review works and what it takes to be a good ...
Participating in the peer review process is – or should be – the most generous task within the academic work. Referees, after all, help authors ...
Double-Blind Peer Review Process | INSPIRA - IAIN Langsa Journals
A double-blind peer review is applied, where the authors' and reviewers' identities are unknown. Double-blind peer review comments are confidential and will ...
Peer Review - Journal of L.M. Montgomery Studies
In double-blind peer review, both the reviewers and the contributors remain anonymous throughout the process. The editors work hard to eliminate conflicts of ...
DOUBLE BLIND PEER REVIEW - Asian Journal of Health Research
Double blind peer-review for submission to this press, every effort should be made to prevent the identities of the authors and reviewers from being known to ...
Double-Blind Policy FAQ - RTSS 2022
Why adopt a double-blind peer-review process? · How are Conflicts of Interests (CoIs) discovered? · How will reviewers judge whether a contribution is “ ...
Anonymous-Double Blind Review Process - STScI
No negative effects could be identified, suggesting that double-blind review should be considered by other journals. Double-blind review is frequently ...
A quick glimpse at double blind peer review [Flowchart] - Editage
In this approach, both parties involved i.e., the authors and the reviewers are unaware of each others' identities. All indicators of identity ...
Ensuring a (double-) blind review - Septentrio Academic Publishing
... double-blind peer review process; You should make a general Conflict of ... If you are attaching any documents to your review report, you need to remove ...
Double-Blinded Peer Review | Science | AAAS
Nature has decided to add an option for double-blind peer review - papers would be sent to the referees without author names or institutional affiliation on ...
Double Blind Peer-Review Process | IJJSRS
Double-blind peer review is a process in which both the reviewer and the author's identities are kept confidential during the review process.
Editorial process (Guidelines for Double-Blind Peer Review)
The journal will ensure that the double-blind review process is followed by assigning the manuscript to two independent reviewers who will evaluate the ...
The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific ...
A less common practice is double-blinding, hiding the author's identity from the reviewer and the reviewer's identity from the author. This ...
Peer reviewers in academia are bound by professional ethics. They do need to abide by the double-blind (and rarely single-blind) pre-requisites.
Recommendation for dual peer-reviewing in science journals ... - OSF
First, have a double-blind peer review with anonymity on both sides since 71 % have confidence in this method (Editorial,. 2008). Second, peer reviewers should ...
vs single-blind peer review effect on acceptance rates: a systematic ...
The double-blind peer review process seemed to be associated with an 18% lower manuscript acceptance rate than the single-blind peer review process.